000 | 02033cam a2200361 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocm08222945 | ||
003 | AE-DuAU | ||
005 | 20240701151359.0 | ||
008 | 090916s2009 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
020 | _a9780745646435 (paperback) | ||
035 | _a(AE-DuAU) 08222945 | ||
040 |
_aAE-DuAU _beng |
||
041 | 1 | _aeng | |
049 | _aTSAUD | ||
050 | 4 | _aBH 301 .P78 R3613 2009 | |
090 | _aBH 301 .P78 R3613 2009 | ||
100 | 1 |
_aRancière, Jacques. _96153 _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe aesthetic unconscious / _cJacques Rancière ; translated by Debra Keates and James Swenson. |
250 | _aEnglish ed. | ||
260 |
_aCambridge ; _aMalden, MA : _bPolity, _cc2009. |
||
300 |
_av, 95 pages : _c19 cm. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 | _aThis book is not concerned with the use of Freudian concepts for the interpretation of literary and artistic works. Rather, it is concerned with why this interpretation plays such an important role in demonstrating the contemporary relevance of psychoanalytic concepts. In order for Freud to use the Oedipus complex as a means for the interpretation of texts, it was necessary first of all for a particular notion of Oedipus, belonging to the Romantic reinvention of Greek antiquity, to have produced a certain idea of the power of the thought that does not think, and the power of the speech that remains silent. From this it does not follow that the Freudian unconscious was already prefigured by the aesthetic unconscious. Freud's "aesthetic" analyses reveal instead a tension between the two forms of unconscious. --From publisher's description. | ||
600 | 1 | 0 |
_aFreud, Sigmund, _d1856-1939 _xAesthetics. _9107243 |
650 | 0 |
_aAesthetics _xPsychological aspects. _9107245 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSubconsciousness. _924961 |
|
700 |
_aKeates ,Debra _etranslator _9205872 |
||
700 |
_aSwenson , James _etranslator _9205873 |
||
942 |
_cBOOK _2lcc |
||
999 |
_c24091 _d24091 |